<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Surprised PageRank Update in February 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/</link>
	<description>Freebies for SEO, Web design, computers, blogging</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 May 2011 10:25:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin LaHay</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-923</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin LaHay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 21:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-923</guid>
		<description>Just as an update, I guess my lower PR was from a penalty.

I fixed the problem and it is back to a PR4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as an update, I guess my lower PR was from a penalty.</p>
<p>I fixed the problem and it is back to a PR4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-729</link>
		<dc:creator>Binh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 18:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-729</guid>
		<description>make money blogging &#187; I agree with &quot;Loads of RSS and newsletters subscribers is better than high PR and position on the SE&#039;s.&quot; 

However, I can&#039;t agree with the later statements:

1. &#039;PR means nothing&#039;. It stands for Google PageRank and it means the popularity of a web page.

2. &#039;if everyone is nofollowing their comments. Then having a high PR is pointless.&#039; No, who ever have higher PR benefit from it, the &#039;nofollow&#039; protects their PR from risks. It only mean the comment left on this blogs have no PR value to your blog. 

3. &#039;I dont beieve that high PR is anyway related to position in the SE&#039;s.&#039;  PR is too well related to position in the SERP. However, there are other SEO practices need to be implemented to fully utilize the potential of high PR. Look at Johnchow.com PR 3 VS Problogger.net PR 6. When you search for &quot;Make Money Blogging&quot; which blog come to the first page? Does John Chow beats ProBlogger or the other way around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>make money blogging &raquo; I agree with "Loads of RSS and newsletters subscribers is better than high PR and position on the SE's." </p>
<p>However, I can't agree with the later statements:</p>
<p>1. 'PR means nothing'. It stands for Google PageRank and it means the popularity of a web page.</p>
<p>2. 'if everyone is nofollowing their comments. Then having a high PR is pointless.' No, who ever have higher PR benefit from it, the 'nofollow' protects their PR from risks. It only mean the comment left on this blogs have no PR value to your blog. </p>
<p>3. 'I dont beieve that high PR is anyway related to position in the SE's.'  PR is too well related to position in the SERP. However, there are other SEO practices need to be implemented to fully utilize the potential of high PR. Look at Johnchow.com PR 3 VS Problogger.net PR 6. When you search for "Make Money Blogging" which blog come to the first page? Does John Chow beats ProBlogger or the other way around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: make money blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-713</link>
		<dc:creator>make money blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-713</guid>
		<description>&quot; I still don&#039;t know what Shoemoney&#039;s targeted keyword is, or perhaps he is already too happy with the RSS subscribers&quot;
Theres a lesson be learned in that.
Loads of RSS and newsletters subscribers is better than high PR and position on the SE&#039;s.
In my own opinion PR means nothing.
Think about it if everyone is nofollowing their comments. Then having a high PR is pointless.
And I dont beieve that high PR is anyway related to position in the SE&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>" I still don't know what Shoemoney's targeted keyword is, or perhaps he is already too happy with the RSS subscribers"<br />
Theres a lesson be learned in that.<br />
Loads of RSS and newsletters subscribers is better than high PR and position on the SE's.<br />
In my own opinion PR means nothing.<br />
Think about it if everyone is nofollowing their comments. Then having a high PR is pointless.<br />
And I dont beieve that high PR is anyway related to position in the SE's.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-684</link>
		<dc:creator>Binh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 07:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-684</guid>
		<description>Collin LaHay &#187; Blog flux still show my PR as 2. I think the SEObook tools is more accurate. At the time of checking http://www.digpagerank.com was broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collin LaHay &raquo; Blog flux still show my PR as 2. I think the SEObook tools is more accurate. At the time of checking <a href="http://www.digpagerank.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.digpagerank.com</a> was broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Collin LaHay</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-683</link>
		<dc:creator>Collin LaHay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 00:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-683</guid>
		<description>Interesting find.  Someone else emailed me about this earlier.  When I look it up on http://pr.blogflux.com it still shows PR4.

At any rate, I am not worried about pagerank as all an increase would do would tempt me to start selling paid links.  =)

I&#039;ll keep hammering posts away and we will see what happens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting find.  Someone else emailed me about this earlier.  When I look it up on <a href="http://pr.blogflux.com" rel="nofollow">http://pr.blogflux.com</a> it still shows PR4.</p>
<p>At any rate, I am not worried about pagerank as all an increase would do would tempt me to start selling paid links.  =)</p>
<p>I'll keep hammering posts away and we will see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monaco</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>monaco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 14:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>what? I wasn&#039;t expecting the PR update until the end of March?  My PR is  still a 3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what? I wasn't expecting the PR update until the end of March?  My PR is  still a 3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Binh Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Binh Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 06:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-679</guid>
		<description>simon &#187; Thanks for your quick response. I wish you good luck in dealing with your PR. Did you try to &lt;strong&gt;contact Google&lt;/strong&gt; through their Webmaster tools to notify them that you already remove the PPP scheme? 

I think another thing to check is the &lt;strong&gt;outgoing links&lt;/strong&gt; to &#039;bad neighborhoods&#039; from your blog to others. Some of the blogs/websites you link to might be banned by Google for black hat SEO or similar reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>simon &raquo; Thanks for your quick response. I wish you good luck in dealing with your PR. Did you try to <strong>contact Google</strong> through their Webmaster tools to notify them that you already remove the PPP scheme? </p>
<p>I think another thing to check is the <strong>outgoing links</strong> to 'bad neighborhoods' from your blog to others. Some of the blogs/websites you link to might be banned by Google for black hat SEO or similar reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon</title>
		<link>http://www.binh.name/surprised-pagerank-update-feb-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-678</link>
		<dc:creator>simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 01:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.binh.name/2008/03/01/surprised-february-pagerank-update/#comment-678</guid>
		<description>not sure whats happened to mine, i did PPP before but have removed it.  Since then not sure what left to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not sure whats happened to mine, i did PPP before but have removed it.  Since then not sure what left to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.393 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-09 23:04:39 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
